Welcome Guest user Sign in | Register  
APS Journals Banner
Journal Cover Image

ISSN: 0894-0282

Subscribe Free Alerts RSS

Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions

Editor-in-Chief: Jonathan Walton
Published by APS PRESS in cooperation with the
International Society for Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions

MPMI Impact Factor Rises Above 4.0

July 1998, Volume 11, Number 7
Pages 668-683
DOI: 10.1094/MPMI.1998.11.7.668

Role of the Agrobacterium tumefaciens VirD2 Protein in T-DNA Transfer and Integration

Kirankumar S. Mysore,1,3 Burgund Bassuner,1 Xiao-bing Deng,1 Nune S. Darbinian,1 Andrei Motchoulski,1 Walt Ream,2 and Stanton B. Gelvin1,3

1Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907-1392, U.S.A.; 2Department of Microbiology, Oregon State University, Corvallis 97331, U.S.A.; 3Purdue Genetics Program, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907-1392, U.S.A.


PDF Print (1445 KB) | PDF with Links (377 KB)

 Open Access.

VirD2 is one of the key Agrobacterium tumefaciens proteins involved in T-DNA processing and transfer. In addition to its endonuclease domain, VirD2 contains a bipartite C-terminal nuclear localization sequence (NLS) and a conserved region called ω that is important for virulence. Previous results from our laboratory indicated that the C-terminal, bipartite NLS and the ω region are not essential for nuclear uptake of T-DNA, and further suggested that the ω domain may be required for efficient integration of T-DNA into the plant genome. In this study, we took two approaches to investigate the importance of the ω domain in T-DNA integration. Using the first approach, we constructed a T-DNA binary vector containing a promoterless gusA-intron gene just inside the right T-DNA border. The expression of β-glucuronidase (GUS) activity in plant cells transformed by this T-DNA would indicate that the T-DNA integrated downstream of a plant promoter. Approximately 0.4% of the tobacco cell clusters infected by a wild-type A. tumefaciens strain harboring this vector stained blue with 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl β-d-glucuronic acid (X-gluc). However, using an ω-mutant A. tumefaciens strain harboring the same binary vector, we did not detect any blue staining. Using the second approach, we directly demonstrated that more T-DNA is integrated into high-molecular-weight plant DNA after infection of Arabidopsis thaliana cells with a wild-type A. tumefaciens strain than with a strain containing a VirD2 ω deletion/substitution. Taken together, these data indicate that the VirD2 ω domain is important for efficient T-DNA integration. To determine whether the use of the T-DNA right border is altered in those few tumors generated by A. tumefaciens strains harboring the ω mutation, we analyzed DNA extracted from these tumors. Our data indicate that the right border was used to integrate the T-DNA in a similar manner regardless of whether the VirD2 protein encoded by the inciting A. tumefaciens was wild-type or contained an ω mutation. In addition, a mutant VirD2 protein lacking the ω domain was as least as active in cleaving a T-DNA border in vitro as was the wild-type protein. Finally, we investigated the role of various amino acids of the ω and bipartite NLS domains in the targeting of a GUS-VirD2 fusion protein to the nucleus of electroporated tobacco protoplasts. Deletion of the ω domain, or mutation of the 10-amino-acid region between the two components of the bipartite NLS, had little effect upon the nuclear targeting of the GUS-VirD2 fusion protein. Mutation of both components of the NLS reduced, but did not eliminate, targeting of the fusion protein to the nucleus.

Cited by

Agrobacterium tumefaciens and A. rhizogenes use different proteins to transport bacterial DNA into the plant cell nucleusMicrobial Biotechnology Aug 2009, Volume 2, Number 4: 416-427
CrossRef
Genome-wide analysis of Agrobacterium T-DNA integration sites in the Arabidopsis genome generated under non-selective conditionsThe Plant Journal Oct 2007, Volume 51, Number 5: 779-791
CrossRef
Caspase-resistant VirD2 protein provides enhanced gene delivery and expression in plantsPlant Cell Reports Aug 2007, Volume 26, Number 8: 1215-1219
CrossRef
Microhomologies between T-DNA ends and target sites often occur in inverted orientation and may be responsible for the high frequency of T-DNA-associated inversionsPlant Cell Reports May 2007, Volume 26, Number 5: 617-630
CrossRef
Conjugative transfer can be inhibited by blocking relaxase activity within recipient cells with intrabodiesMolecular Microbiology Feb 2007, Volume 63, Number 2: 404-416
CrossRef
Biological systems of the host cell involved in Agrobacterium infectionCellular Microbiology Feb 2007, Volume 9, Number 1: 9-20
CrossRef
Identification and Characterization of Plant Genes Involved in Agrobacterium-Mediated Plant Transformation by Virus-Induced Gene SilencingMolecular Plant-Microbe Interactions Jan 2007, Volume 20, Number 1: 41-52
Abstract | PDF Print (683 KB) | PDF with Links (712 KB) | e-Xtra 
Transgenic Arabidopsis plants expressing Agrobacterium tumefaciens VirD2 protein are less susceptible to Agrobacterium transformationMolecular Plant Pathology Dec 2006, Volume 7, Number 6: 473-484
CrossRef
Transfer of T-DNA and Vir proteins to plant cells by Agrobacterium tumefaciens induces expression of host genes involved in mediating transformation and suppresses host defense gene expressionThe Plant Journal Aug 2003, Volume 35, Number 2: 219-236
CrossRef
Ku80- and DNA ligase IV-deficient plants are sensitive to ionizing radiation and defective in T-DNA integrationThe Plant Journal Jun 2003, Volume 34, Number 4: 427-440
CrossRef
Comparison between nuclear localization of nopaline- and octopine-specific Agrobacterium VirE2 proteins in plant, yeast and mammalian cellsMolecular Plant Pathology Jun 2001, Volume 2, Number 3: 171-176
CrossRef
NUCLEIC ACID TRANSPORT IN PLANT-MICROBE INTERACTIONS: The Molecules That Walk Through the WallsAnnual Review of Microbiology Nov 2000, Volume 54, Number 1: 187-219
CrossRef
From host recognition to T-DNA integration: the function of bacterial and plant genes in the Agrobacterium-plant cell interactionMolecular Plant Pathology Aug 2000, Volume 1, Number 4: 201-212
CrossRef
AGROBACTERIUM AND PLANT GENES INVOLVED IN T-DNA TRANSFER AND INTEGRATIONAnnual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology Jul 2000, Volume 51, Number 1: 223-256
CrossRef
Arabidopsis ecotypes and mutants that are recalcitrant to Agrobacterium root transformation are susceptible to germ-line transformationThe Plant Journal Feb 2000, Volume 21, Number 1: 9-16
CrossRef
The DNA sequences of T-DNA junctions suggest that complex T-DNA loci are formed by a recombination process resembling T-DNA integrationThe Plant Journal Dec 1999, Volume 20, Number 3: 295-304
CrossRef
Agrobacterium tumefaciens Transformation of the Radiation Hypersensitive Arabidopsis thaliana Mutants uvh1 and rad5Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions Nov 1998, Volume 11, Number 11: 1136-1141
Abstract | PDF Print (313 KB) | PDF with Links (273 KB)